Freedom of Information Act

The Freedom of Information Act sets forth the framework for access to public records. S.C. Code Ann. §30-4-10 et seq.


  • “It is vital in a democratic society that public business be performed in an open and public manner so that citizens shall be advised of the performance of public officials and of the decisions that are reached in public activity and in the formulation of public policy.”
  • “Toward this end, provisions of this chapter must be construed so as to make it possible for citizens, or their representatives, to learn and report fully the activities of their public officials at a minimum cost or delay to the persons seeking access to public documents or meetings.”


  • “Person” includes any individual, corporation, partnership, firm, organization or association.
  • “Public record” includes all books, papers, maps, photographs, cards, tapes, recordings, or other documentary materials regardless of physical form or characteristics prepared, owned, used, in the possession of, or retained by a public body.
  • “Public record” does not include income tax returns, medical records, hospital medical staff reports, scholastic records, adoption records, library records, and other records which by law are required to be closed to the public.

Right to Access Public Records

A person has a right to inspect, copy, or receive an electronic transmission of any public record of a public body.


The public body may establish and collect reasonable fees not to exceed the actual cost of the search, retrieval, and redaction of records. A fee schedule must be posted online, and a fee shall not exceed the prorated hourly salary of the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill and training to perform the request. Fees may not be charged for examination and review to determine if the documents are exempt from disclosure. Fees can be charged for copying but must not exceed the prevailing commercial rate. Fees may be charged for converting paper records to electronic format. Documents may be furnished when appropriate without charge or at a reduced charge where the agency determines that waiver or reduction of the fee is in the public interest because furnishing the information can be considered as primarily benefiting the general public. A deposit not to exceed five percent of the total reasonably anticipated cost for reproduction of the records may be required prior to the public body searching for or making copies of records. The full amount of the total cost must be paid at the time of the production of the request.

Framework for Production

If record is less than 24 months old at the time of the request, notify the person making the request of its determination and the reasons for it within ten days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) of the receipt of the request. Further, the record must be furnished or made available for inspection or copying no later than thirty calendar days from the date on which the final determination was provided.

If record is more than 24 months old at the time of the request, notify the person making the request of its determination and the reasons for it within twenty days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) of the receipt of the request or, if a deposit was required then thirty calendar days from the date on which the deposit was received. The record must be furnished or made available for inspection or copying no later than thirty-five calendar days from the date on which the final determination was provided or, if a deposit was required then thirty-five calendar days from the date on which the deposit was received. Moreover, if written notification of the determination of the public body as to the availability of the requested public record is neither mailed, electronically transmitted, nor personally delivered to the person requesting the document within the time set forth by this section, the request must be considered approved as to nonexempt records or information. The various response, determination, and production deadlines provided by this subsection are subject to extension by written mutual agreement of the public body and the requesting party at issue, and this agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld.


A public body may but is not required to exempt from disclosure the following information:

  • Trade secrets
  • Information of a personal nature where the public disclosure thereof would constitute unreasonable invasion of personal privacy, such as:
    • Gross receipts contained in applications for business licenses
    • Name, address, and telephone number of handicapped or disabled individuals
    • Audio recording of the final statements of a dying victim in a call to 911 (subject to redaction or waiver by next of kin)
  • Records, video or audio recordings, or other information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information:
    • Would interfere with a prospective law enforcement proceeding;
    • Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication;
    • Would constitute an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy;
    • Would disclose the identity of a confidential source;
    • Would disclose current techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions;
    • Would endanger the life or physical safety of any individual;
    • Would disclose any contents of intercepted communications not otherwise disclosed during a trial;
  • Matters specifically exempted from disclosure by statute or law:
    • Data recorded by a body-worn camera is not a public record subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (SC Code Ann. §23-1-240(G)(1))
    • Documentary or other material prepared by or for the Insurance Reserve Fund in providing any insurance coverage authorized by this section or any other provision of law which is contained in any claim file is subject to disclosure to the extent required by the Freedom of Information Act only after the claim is settled or finally concluded by a court of competent jurisdiction (SC Code Ann. §1-11-140(G))
  • Correspondence or work products of legal counsel for a public body and any other material that would violate attorney-client relationships.
  • The identity, or information tending to reveal the identity, of any individual who in good faith makes a complaint or otherwise discloses information, which alleges a violation or potential violation of law or regulation, to a state regulatory agency.
  • Documents of and documents incidental to proposed contractual arrangements and documents of and documents incidental to proposed sales or purchases of property (subject to exceptions)
  • Photographs, videos, and other visual images, and audio recordings of and related to the performance of an autopsy (subject to exceptions including for parents, surviving spouse, children, personal representative and next of kin).
  • Other exceptions not relevant to today’s presentation

If any public record contains material which is not exempt under subsection (a) of this section, the public body shall separate the exempt and nonexempt material and make the nonexempt material available in accordance with the requirements of this chapter.

Certain Matters Declared Public Information

The following categories of information are specifically made public information:

  • Final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders, made in the adjudication of cases
  • Statements of policy and interpretations of policy, statute, and the Constitution which have been adopted by the public body
  • Reports which disclose the nature, substance, and location of any crime or alleged crime reported as having been committed (subject to redaction and may not be used for commercial solicitation)
  • Data from a video or audio recording made by a law enforcement vehicle-mounted recording device or dashboard camera that involves an officer involved incident resulting in death, injury, property damage, or the use of deadly force (subject to judicial determination)
  • Other information not relevant to today’s presentation

Injunctive Relief

A citizen of the State may apply to the circuit court for a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, or both, to enforce FOIA. One must apply within one year of the date of the alleged violation. The Chief administrative judge of the circuit court must schedule an initial hearing within ten days of the service on all parties. If the hearing court is unable to make a final ruling at the initial hearing, the court shall establish a scheduling order to conclude actions brought pursuant to this chapter within six months of initial filing. The court may extend this time period upon a showing of good cause. The court may order equitable relief as it considers appropriate, and a violation of this chapter must be considered to be an irreparable injury for which no adequate remedy at law exists. If a person or entity seeking relief under this section prevails, he may be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees and other costs of litigation specific to the request. If the person or entity prevails in part, the court may in its discretion award him reasonable attorney’s fees or an appropriate portion of those attorney’s fees.

Read More

Clawson Fargnoli Opens 2nd Location in Walterboro, SC

Clawson Fargnoli is excited to announce the opening of our new law office in Walterboro, SC! This is something of a homecoming for Christy, who grew up in Walterboro and still has many friends and family there. While we already handle a wide variety of cases across the state, this new office will give us a permanent presence in Colleton County. We look forward to working with our esteemed colleagues in the Colleton County Bar and to becoming a part of the Walterboro business community. Our office is located at 128 North Memorial Avenue and is open by appointment. Reach us at our Walterboro office by calling (843) 605-0161.

Read More

$850,000 Settlement in Dram Shop Case

Clawson Fargnoli recently settled a dram shop case for $850,000, a total recovery of approximately ten times the medical expenses. After our clients were hit head by a drunk driver and suffered various injuries, we sued the drunk driver and used that lawsuit as a vehicle for unilateral discovery against the bar. In addition to settling the claims against the drunk driver on a covenant not to execute and collecting all of the available auto insurance coverage, we sent a settlement demand to the bar, who requested a pre-suit mediation where they paid out a significant portion of the available coverage. 

Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and death cases across the state, including dram shop cases.

Read More

Successful Settlement in Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident on I-95

Clawson Fargnoli recently settled a motor vehicle accident case for $235,000. Our clients were traveling on I-95 in Colleton County when another driver collided with our clients’ vehicle, causing them to run off the road and into a tree. One of our clients was tragically killed in the accident and the other suffered a traumatic brain injury. Unfortunately, the at fault driver was from Florida and only carried minimum limits insurance of $10,000 per person. Undeterred, we worked diligently to recover the full limits of the uninsured motorist coverage under our client’s auto policy. While the amount recovered in no way made our clients whole, we are proud to have helped them obtain all of the compensation available. 

Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and death cases across the state, including motor vehicle accident cases. 

Read More

Rabies Exposure in Downtown Charleston Results in $67,000 Settlement

Clawson Fargnoli recently settled a rabies exposure case for $67,000. Our clients had rented a home in downtown Charleston that suffered from a bat infestation, which the property owner and property manager were unable to successfully control. After being exposed to multiple live and dead bats over the course of several weeks, DHEC recommended that the family receive prophylactic rabies injections. After pre-suit negotiations with the insurance adjuster were unproductive, we filed suit and were able to negotiate a fair settlement shortly thereafter.  Not every case results in a seven figure recovery, but all of our clients are important to us and we’re proud to have helped this family recoup their medical expenses, moving expenses and recover for their pain and suffering.  Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and death cases across the state, including rabies exposure claims.

Read More

Nursing Home Negligence Case Results in $1,000,000 Settlement

Clawson Fargnoli is pleased to announce a $1,000,000 settlement in a nursing home negligence case in Georgetown County, achieved while working alongside our friends and colleagues at Cantwell Law Firm. Sadly, our client, who was confined to a wheelchair, was not secured with a lap belt by nursing home employees and fell out of the chair, resulting in a severe neck injury that required surgery and extensive rehabilitation. We demanded arbitration pursuant to the agreement with the nursing home and immediately noticed 30(b)(6) depositions of various corporate representatives, wherein numerous breaches of the standard of care were established, and sent a policy limits time demand to quickly secure all available insurance.

We are grateful that this speedy recovery will allow our client to enjoy a better quality of life and obtain the level of care she needs and deserves.

Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and wrongful death claims across the state, including nursing home abuse and neglect cases.

Read More

Trip and Fall Results in $150,000 Settlement

Clawson Fargnoli recently settled a trip and fall case for $150,000. After our client tripped and fell on a ramp inside a building, resulting in a complex fracture of her wrist and two subsequent surgeries, we filed suit against both the owner (landlord) and occupier (tenant) of the building alleging premises liability. Our expert witness, in the areas of engineering and human factors, opined that the ramp was in violation of numerous building codes and industry standards because of its excessive slope. We mediated the case and were successful in resolving it, despite the fact that the most culpable party did not have liability insurance for the loss and inevitably had to pay with personal funds.

Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and death cases across the state, including trip and fall cases.

Read More

Moped vs. Tree Accident Results in $345,000 Settlement

Clawson Fargnoli recently settled a moped vs. tree accident for $345,000. While operating a moped in Berkeley County at night, our client suddenly came upon a downed tree laying completely across the roadway. He crashed into the tree and, while lying in the roadway, was struck a second time when a passing car also hit the downed tree. Our client suffered a head contusion, road rash and a complex fracture of his wrist that required open reduction and external fixation surgery.

In addition to initially settling pre-suit with the driver of the other vehicle for his minimum limits of $25,000, we also filed suit against a government entity and two private landowners after they all initially denied liability for the fallen tree. The tree was within government entity’s right of way and on property owned by the private landowners, but they each disputed that they had any duty to inspect or remove visibly dead trees.

After approximately a year of litigation, thousands of pages of document production and numerous depositions, the government entity agreed to pay $270,000 to settle the case after we uncovered indisputable evidence that its employees had repeatedly failed to observe and remove this visibly dead tree during annual inspections in violation of their policies and procedures. Subsequently, we settled with the private landowners for $50,000 after a lengthy debate over their liability centered around the issue of whether this area was urban or rural, which dictated their duty to inspect for and remove visibly dead trees.

Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and death cases across the state, including tree fall cases.

Read More

Successful Resolution in Maritime Case Totaling $185,000

Clawson Fargnoli recently settled a maritime case for $185,000. Our client was working aboard a vessel engaged in salvage operations when his leg was crushed between two vessels. He was rushed to the hospital where he was diagnosed with compartment syndrome and underwent two surgeries. A key issue in the case was whether our client was classified as a seaman under the Jones Act or a harbor worker under the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act, which affected the remedies available to him and the value of the case.

While our client was injured while employed upon a vessel engaged in navigation and performing the mission of the vessel, he spent the majority of his time ashore and was primarily employed as a mechanic in the company’s shipyard, making the determination of his status complicated. As a result, the parties agreed to participate in a pre-suit mediation and were able to reach a compromise settlement. Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and death cases across the state, including maritime and admiralty cases.

Read More

Successful Day Care Abuse Settlement Approximately Ten Times Child’s Medical Expenses

Clawson Fargnoli is pleased to announce the settlement of a daycare abuse case in Richland County. Our client, a three year old child, was improperly handled by a childcare center employee who improperly pulled the child up off the floor by one arm when he failed to follow directions, resulting in an elbow fracture. When the child’s obvious pain and discomfort was reported to the center director by another employee hours later, the director reviewed the center’s video footage and observed the improper handling of the child. When confronted, the at fault employee maintained her innocence and shamelessly attempted to cast blame on the child’s mother for causing his injury. We filed suit and the case settled shortly thereafter for approximately ten times the child’s medical expenses. Think of Clawson Fargnoli for life altering personal injury and death cases across the South Carolina, including daycare abuse and neglect cases.

Read More

Contact Us